Another wrap-it-up dress

Reader Renee sent this lovely pattern image to me -- she's actually made it, and the pattern was her grandmother's.

The pattern envelope reads:

"Make it in a jiffy -- then simply slip it over your head, wrap the back to the front and button -- you're set for a dozen chores in and out of doors. Carryall pockets are a handy addition. (A) Short cobbler's apron. (B) Coverall."

Renee also helpfully sends us the back of the pattern (have I mentioned lately how much I love you all? I really do)



Because I am an evil, horrible person, before I posted this I searched on eBay and found and bought one -- in my size, even. I now recommend you do a search on eBay yourself (since I got mine). (See how awful I am?)

The only other one I found online is at SoVintage Patterns ... and it's $35.00. I would love to go find Renee's grandmother and tell her that this Saturday knock-around dress pattern now goes for $35. Worth every penny, really, but still!

The nice thing about this version (compared with the the other wrap-around dress, Butterick 4790) is that this one shouldn't have the skirt-riding-up problem that was reported. Oh, and it has POCKETS! Triangular ones!

I think what I like best about these dresses is the implied assumption that you had STUFF TO DO; stuff that might be dirty or messy, but still, STUFF, and you were going to do it, and look good while doing it. And happy. You were going to look happy, too, or at least these women were. I don't see many modern clothes with this assumption ... so I have a huge rant building up about the unnecessary disparagement of practical clothing for women. Prepare yourselves ...

And I head to Tokyo today and Taipei on Tuesday, so posting might be spotty over the next few days. If you're a recent arrival here at ADAD HQ, may I direct you to the archives, over there on the right? Scroll down ...

Comments

[Becky]

You know you are really evil, right? This pattern is simply fantastic and Renee is so lucky!If you are going to snap up the cute patterns and taunt us, I think it is only fair that you make it up immediately and post some pictures : )Maybe I can make my own pattern from the posted envelope scan using my bifocals... sigh.~Becky

[Latter-Day Flapper]

I just saw that on eBay a week or so ago, for much less than $35. Keep checking there.

[harthad]

On the topic of practical clothing: a couple of weeks ago I was cleaning house whilst wearing a skirt. My husband was horrified that I was working in "nice" clothes. I thought, generations of women before me cleaned house (not mention worked in the fields and did all sorts of tasks) while wearing dresses. What am I supposed to wear now, sweats? They're too hot! A skirt is nice and cool, gives you freedom of motion, and if it's a cotton/blend, easily washable. I swear, I'm gonna make myself some house dresses like my grandma had....

[Mary]

Wow, this pattern came from the May Co. department store, third floor. Department stores with fabric, that brings back nice memories.

[Lisa Martin]

I love it!! that's sweet. Makes me think of an old cookbook my mom gave me. In the eggs section it says "it behoves any wife to find out how her husband likes his eggs and make them for him" when he wants them!! To which dh replied "yeah!!"

[mamafrog]

This makes me think of a dress pattern in an old book I read. It was about making clothing based on ancient Viking clothes. The women supposedly wore a dress like this over a tunic of some kind, or without in summer. (Hardy people, up there!) I can't remember the name of the book, or who wrote it, wish I could as it was truly interesting and had easy patterns in it.

[Jen]

That is DARLING! You are evil..."Utiltarian", practical clothing...why it has to be hideous and drab, I've no idea. If they can make workout wear look mildly cute, certainly bumming-and-working-around-the-house clothing can be cute, too (I do have a few skirts exclusively for these sorts of days, but nothing nearly as charming as this in a jiffy fabulousness...).

[The J]

I'm afraid to say, my grandmother was horrified at my talk of using those pockets - they were FASHION. One didn't use the pockets, that would ruin the line!

[Rebecca]

You guys do not let the grass grow under your feet! I scrolled and scrolled and finally came up with a Butterick 6655, Bust 30. Next Google: "Industrial Corsets". Erin, you do well to keep your leads under your hat when dealing with this tricksy lot.

[Sondra]

I have been converted. I am making dresses for working at home. I am cooler than I would be in pants, I look a whole lot better than I do in shorts, and I can move. I even ride my bike in a dress. That cool air blowing up my legs - oh, my! Every single time I go out in public in one of my flowery, or polka-dotted, or plaid cotton dresses, I get at least one compliment from a stranger. Thank you, Erin...and my dear daughter, for your pointing the way to true sartorial happiness.

[theresa]

WWWAAAAA! I want it and can't find one even close to my size. Poo Poo! Adding insult to injury at some point butterick used that number again for something hideous! I will pay one of you smart cookies to make me a copy (on a copier, paper bags, tissue paper -- whatever!) Erin since you taunt us so - I agree that we should be a rewarded with photos of the finished product.

[Latter-Day Flapper]

I've got a grand total of two pairs of rarely-worn jeans, no dress pants, no sweats, and no shorts. I *always* wear skirts or dresses, unless maybe I'm changing the oil in my car. Pants don't fit me, they're much too hot, and they look awful on us pear-shaped people. I do have "schlubby" skirts but they're still skirts.And I love all these creative wrap-type dresses. I could go broke bidding on those zipperless suckers.

[Meg]

so Cute, I love it...

[Chelsea]

I made my first dress this last week. It was the "other" wrap-around dress. Unfortunately, it is not the most flattering pattern on me, since it accentuates my broad shoulders and rather flat chest. :(So I can only guess that if you don't have linebacker shoulders and a chest to match, this dress would most likely be so cute! I'm sooo sad it didn't work out for me.

[little dresses]

Just found you! I love dresses, you are a woman after my own heart!

[Barb]

The only "stuff" you do in these clothes, according to the pattern, are chores. Chores. Seriously. Think about it.While I like the pattern (I made the Butterick 4790, which I have not yet worn to complete any chores), I am always interested in how oppressive the jargon on these older patterns is and how people don't seem to notice.And yes, I realize when the pattern was printed. But this topic is really intertwined with women's clothing....maybe we should talk about it instead of just glossing over it. Just an idea. (not sure if this is what the huge rant is about...)

[Rebecca]

Good topic, Barb! I'd like to say a word in defense of chores and dressing with intention. I think our culture has been damaged by the wresting of all dignity from work which has to be done over and over again, attracts little outside attention, is often done for "the least of these, my brethren", and is mostly done by women. Chores, in other words. In my opinion, we made a mistake in going straight from, "Hey! I shouldn't have to do this all the time, all by myself", to "This is stupid work that no one should have to do."Pattern envelopes display a hearty dose of historically accurate mysogyny, I'm sure. But when I'm swishing through my routine in a vintage dress, I feel like my work has added worth and purpose. An attractive, functional, homemade garment is a powerful (and, I would add, subversive) thing.

[sara jane]

Hear hear! Also a die hard, pear-shaped skirt-wearer for almost all occasions. Bah, who needs uncomfortable, ill-fitting pants.And if you really like the apron aesthetic, check out this readily-available Park Bench pattern: http://www.parkbenchpatterns.com/22.htmlApron/dress with pockets. Not necessarily vintage, but still has the "watch me work" vibe.

[Anonymous]

I'm having trouble visualizing this dress in 3-D: do you guys think there's a danger of bending over and having the back bodice portion ride up and pull away from the back skirt portion? Would you constantly be tugging the back bodice down to meet the back skirt waist? Or is there sufficient overlap or a fastener?

[stacy]

it's not really a dress, it's a cover-all, for wearing over a dress so you don't muck up your good clothes. Like men often wear coveralls at work, no different except back then women didn't wear pants so their coveralls needed to cover a dress.

[India]

Oh, I love this. Want!

[Susan Marie]

This dress and the collective reaction to it reminds me of a day shopping with my mother while I was in high school. I saw a simple, button down shirt-dress in an adorable fabric and declared it to be "such a pretty dress". My mom, very practical, turned her nose up and said, "you can't be serious, it looks like a Russian washer-woman dress". Of course, that only made it more charming in my mind! It's so funny that a work dress in one era is a coveted fashion in another.

[Sherri]

HOW FUNNY that you post this the day after I finished my own Butterick 4790 wrap-around! I twirled around my grandmother's kitchen in it and she was beside herself seeing me in a dress she once wore on a regular basis. :-)

[Tasbeeh]

I just saw Hairspray and the movie is STOCK FULL of the most gorgeous dresses I've ever seen in my life- I thought of this blog everytime I saw a dress I liked.They have an eBay shop: http://hairspray.ebay.com/special/hairspray.htm

[Anonymous]

I have this pattern!! But I think that it is incomplete--now I will have to go find it and look!Dawn