Melissa, who sent this, swears I've shown it before, but I can't find it (I REALLY need to add those pattern number tags).
This is a Butterick reissue, so you can buy it in your size, instead of altering the vintage version. (If you wait for the big-box fabric store sales, you can probably get it for $2. In fact, all Butterick patterns are on sale at Hancock Fabrics this week for $1.99.)
I think this would be an excellent pattern to help you use up your stash of smaller pieces -- if you make the two-tone version, the contrast part is less than 2 yds, and the main body is about three. Since most of my patterns fall about laughing if I try to make them up with less than four or five yards of a single fabric, I'm seriously considering this one. I have to start using up those smaller bits ... of course, what I saved in using up fabric I would spend in trying to find interesting bias binding! I have two complementary pieces of cherry-print quilting fabric that would be adorable in this dress, if I have enough. Or maybe that bright pink seersucker I keep pulling out and putting away again ...
Here's the line drawing, and my question:


































I have that pattern. Go for the bright pink seersucker. I think I have enough 60s pop pique for mine... white with pink and lime green pattern.you are such an inspiration for me to start clothes sewing again.Like I need another obessession.
Posted by: Miz Shoes | 05/09/2006 at 08:17 AM
I have that pattern too! The vintage one. I had been thinking about trying to make it for a while, but I think I may be too short to wear it.
Posted by: zelia | 05/09/2006 at 10:14 AM
Are there darts on the front? Is that where you mean to put the pocket? That is what would make sense to me.I'd love to see it in the cherry print, with gingham binding. Or the bright pink seersucker with lime green binding. There are so many fun possiblilties with this dress. the option of adding a second fabric makes it even more fun.
Posted by: Rooskie Dooskie | 05/09/2006 at 10:49 AM
Ohhhhh. That one has been on my E-bay list (unsuccessfuly) forever. Thank you! Thank you!And yes, it cries out for seersucker.
Posted by: Jonquil | 05/09/2006 at 12:51 PM
The discussion on Craftster about this dress has gone for 16 pages, and still continues! It's Retro Butterick 4790 and it's a reissue of 5368, the "Easy Whirl Away Dress."I might just have to add this to my "to-sew list."
Posted by: Sara | 05/09/2006 at 02:42 PM
What about welt pockets like this:welt pocket directionsP.S. I love your blog!!!
Posted by: Anonymous | 05/09/2006 at 05:13 PM
I was about to leave a comment about diagonal pockets, then clicked on the welt pocket - that was exactly what I was about to describe! (great minds think alike)
Posted by: Suzanne | 05/09/2006 at 09:51 PM
I actually made this dress a couple (ok, like 5) years ago--measure carefully! The sizing was wacky.
Posted by: Tikimama | 05/09/2006 at 10:58 PM
Oh dear. There goes this month's clothes budget!Looking forward to making this for sure.
Posted by: Shiny Blue Black | 05/09/2006 at 11:28 PM
Thank you for posting about this pattern! I regretted not buying it when it was in print before, and I was yet again thinking wistfully of it as I was contemplating what to make for the coming summer. I think I have to go pick it up now. :)
Posted by: Mandy | 05/10/2006 at 05:08 AM
I think that I would use patch pockets. I would put them on the skirt front, in the area that would be covered by the back skirt wrapping over the front skirt. That way, if they are not perfect, it would not matter so much.Amy
Posted by: Anonymous | 05/10/2006 at 08:40 AM
Ditto tikimama above. I made this many years ago (when the reissue pattern first came out) and I was so disappointed with the screwed up sizing that I chucked it and never made it again.Even if you don't usually, make a muslin for this one or you'll be weeping over some good, lost fabric.--Lydia
Posted by: Anonymous | 05/10/2006 at 09:07 AM
I have also made this one up, several times, and I heartily suggest it for a more formal look as well as the obvious picnic-wear. I made it twice in irridescent taffeta, one pink and one emerald green. Now I'm making it in pink cotton plaid with orange binding. I'll have to add the pockets (I think patch, on the front panel).
Posted by: Rebecca Kessler | 05/10/2006 at 09:56 AM
Am I a total geek for looking at the illustration and thinking, "Boy, would it be easy to take those parts from patterns that I have that I know already fit me and combine them to reproduce that effect"?I see here a fitted sheath dress with, perhaps, slightly extended sides. The back of the sheath is cut off at the waist (the darts curve in, but not out again - that tells me it's cut off at the waist), and a half-circle skirt is added to the back shift piece. And I gave full instructions on how to cut a half circle skirt without a pattern a few posts back.The other main difference, of course, is that the underarm seam has been eliminated. Ladies, if you have patterns in your stock that already fit you, and you've been frustrated by this one, you may want to get out papers, pencils and rulers, and try your own personally-fitted versions.And you could even add pockets.Oh, and Meredith? What, they only had six-foot-tall or taller women in the fifties? Five foot four is the average these days. I bet it would look darling on you. As long as it's proportioned to fit your body (you know where your knees are!) (and "you" means "everyone"), it will look just fine.
Posted by: La BellaDonna | 05/10/2006 at 10:27 AM
Thank you for posting this picture. I made this in its original issue some 50 years ago and it was my favorite dress for quite awhile. The front was pink and the back was lavender in plain old cheap cotton.For several years I have been planning to make it again by adjusting patterns I already have, as was suggested above. but now I can have the pattern itself again.chile pepper
Posted by: Anonymous | 05/10/2006 at 11:27 AM
I have that pattern, too! I have contrasting prints in green and cream that have been sitting around since I was in 3rd grade that I'm planning to sew up into this dress as soon as I have time. And every time I see the fabric and the pattern together, I think about how fun it would be to sew it up in the contrasting 4-H prints that are available occasionally.
Posted by: Harriet | 05/11/2006 at 12:02 AM
The other post of this dress was on May 21, 2005. No wait, this 'new' dress appears to wrap back-to-front, and the other front-to-back. Maybe I'm looking at it wrong. In any case, the line drawings are similar if not the same.- leigh7911
Posted by: Anonymous | 05/11/2006 at 12:32 AM
I just bought this pattern last week and it is super easy. The photo in the pattern book seemed to me to be a giveaway that the sizing was wacky so I just made it smaller and it fits a little better.Rachel
Posted by: Anonymous | 05/11/2006 at 01:22 AM
Those puffy skirts must take up tons 'o material. I usually need about 2 1/4 yds total to make a dress. But I mostly like mod styles so they're usually shortish and not really gathered. It's really cute though.
Posted by: Melinda | 05/11/2006 at 08:04 AM
you are awesome! I just bought my copy of the pattern yesterday! I hadn't looked here in a couple of days and was thinking that this was a pattern that you might enjoy too. I have missed this pattern so very much and am overjoyed at its return. I have fabric to make 3. I also bought the vintage dress that was a page ahead in the Butterick catalog. can't wait...must sew now. Good luck with the pockets.
Posted by: anneland22 | 05/12/2006 at 03:12 AM
And you know what's sad? I, too, shall buy this pattern - even though I have no access to Hancock's or JoAnn Fabrics, and must therefore pay Good Cash Money for it - and even though I shall doubtless wind up making the same sorts of modifications I suggested above.I just love patterns. Patterns and fabric; fabric and patterns. Fabrics and patterns and trims: these are a few of my favorite things!
Posted by: La BellaDonna | 05/12/2006 at 08:46 AM
Thank you so much for posting this! I have some fabric I've been dying to use for a dress but just couldn't find the perfect pattern - and here it is! This will be my very first project when I get back from vacation.
Posted by: Ang. | 05/12/2006 at 10:20 AM
wow. I just ordered this pattern! It's gorgeous.Now, em, I need to buy a sewing machine.Do you have any recommendations of good machines for rank beginners?
Posted by: Shannon | 05/12/2006 at 01:54 PM
Shannon, good luck! I myself have not purchased a sewing machine since 1990, but Threads has a good article about buying one here:http://www.taunton.com/threads/pages/t00133.asp
Posted by: Erin | 05/12/2006 at 02:42 PM
thank you!
Posted by: Shannon | 05/14/2006 at 10:59 PM