Simplicity Itself
This is from Janet at Lanetz Living, who has TWO copies of this in stock (as I write this) in B35 and B37. I *almost* made one of them mine, but I'm trying to hold fast to my resolve not to buy any more patterns until 2010. If you are not laboring under a similar resolution you might want to know that Janet is having a sale: 25% off your entire order (one time only); it ends 12/31.
I really love this (and I'm sure the orange version lurking in the background has nothing, nothing to do with that). I'd even recommend this as a fantastic candidate for a wedding dress (again, in the long and sleeveless version, but possibly not in orange). Think of it in a heavy peau de soie, yes? Or a really nice brocade ... lovely. Slap a veil on that sucker and call it a day. (Although: *don't* call it "the happiest day of your life." Why limit yourself?)
The version with sleeves is a bit too Star Trek Epaulet for my taste, but hey, your taste may (and certainly can) differ. If you love it, go for it. Live long and prosper.
Labels: party_dresses, Simplicity_2463
posted by Erin @ 7:35 AM
21 Comments:
At Dec 18, 2009 10:23:00 AM,
Anonymous said…
Actually, I rather like the version with sleeves... but then, I've been re-watching DS9 over the past few months ;)
At Dec 18, 2009 12:46:00 PM,
Cookie said…
Nice accessories! This IS elegant, but could also go "Pilgrim" for Thanksgiving theme parties if it were all brown, and just the center piece white, front and back. I am beginning to think no hostess' wardrobe is complete without a jaunty yet subtle Pilgrim dress for the holidays. Think of the memories you'd be creating! And it could be passed down through the generations, like a Santa suit.
At Dec 18, 2009 10:27:00 PM,
Anonymous said…
What's wrong with their necks? Do they have some sort of curvature of the spine?
At Dec 18, 2009 11:33:00 PM,
Theresa said…
i too like the sleeved version.
At Dec 19, 2009 1:11:00 AM,
Ashliegh in Wonderland said…
I hear ya sister in the,"don't call it the happiest day of your life". I'm engaged and i'm SOOO sick of hearing how it will be the best day of my life! I've been with my partner since high school, almost 10years now, sure marrying the man of my dreams and having a big fabulous party sure will be an amazing day...but surely with all the wonderful things that you can achieve in the world, surely they'll be many more. Forgive my rant, I'm just so pleased to hear I'm not alone lol :)
At Dec 19, 2009 9:26:00 AM,
evalyn said…
That's the famous "swan neck" of myth and legend and pattern envelope. Me, I don't find the "no shoulders" look to be attractive. Lacking a diminutive and modest spirit, I actually have shoulders and prefer something with a set in sleeve.
At Dec 22, 2009 6:53:00 AM,
Sandy's Fancy Pants Antiques and Collectibles said…
Simple but elegant. One could do a lot of embellishments on this pattern. Cute.
At Dec 22, 2009 1:07:00 PM,
Cookie said…
I've noticed the “slenderette” label before, too. It sounds like an artificial sweetener.
There’s a sad line of patterns from the 1950’s and 60’s called CHUB-DEB. I don’t know if Deb is supposedly a person, or a debutante. But the girls on the patterns always look perfectly fine.
At Dec 25, 2009 12:01:00 PM,
kanishk said…
What's wrong with their necks? Do they have some sort of curvature of the spine?
Work from home India
At Dec 26, 2009 12:30:00 PM,
Theresa said…
Half size slenderette fit me better because they are for full figured short ladies. I wish they still made them.
At Dec 26, 2009 2:01:00 PM,
Cookie said…
So Slenderettes are more about height? They're Petitettes?
At Dec 27, 2009 4:15:00 AM,
Ay said…
It´s such a pleasure to look at all this amazing dresses!
Im your follower now!
http://aygenart.blogspot.com/
cheers from germany
At Dec 27, 2009 1:35:00 PM,
Theresa said…
Cookie - well short women anyway. I'm 5'2" but broad shouldered and large bossomed. I guess you could say it's a height and weight thing.
At Dec 29, 2009 8:27:00 AM,
Theresa said…
I know it's the holidays but I am strting to get worried about Erin. I fear she may be trapped under a giant fruitcake.
At Dec 30, 2009 5:52:00 PM,
Rainy Daisy said…
Well hello. I wanted to drop you a line and see if you'd ever seen this website: http://www.koshka-the-cat.com/
Check out some of the costume dresses this chick has made. AMAZING. I am absolutely appalled that there is such a gorgeous Austen-esque ball gown in existence and that it is not under my possession. There's also a particularly fabulous 20s silk dress. sigh! You have to look...
At Dec 31, 2009 10:14:00 AM,
weezieduzzit said…
Half sizes are designed to fit 5'3" and shorter. "Slenderettes" were designed to fit fuller figured women.
At Dec 31, 2009 2:28:00 PM,
Cookie said…
<< "Slenderettes" were designed to fit fuller figured women. >>
So, I'm missing where the "slender" part comes in?
At Jan 3, 2010 3:31:00 PM,
Honore said…
You've been awarded a blog award!
http://bygoneknits.blogspot.com/2010/01/another-award.html
Love,
Honore
At Jan 4, 2010 4:38:00 AM,
Nathalie said…
I'm 5'10 yet I find I prefer using vintage half-size patterns because they're fuller busted yet not as wide across the shoulders as their full size equivalent. I like my bodices fitted, yet full sizes always seem to come up a bit baggy and I end up having to take them in.
I find it much easier lengthening the waist if necessary, and adding a good 4 - 5 inches to the bottom hem than making FBAs...
At Jan 4, 2010 5:03:00 AM,
Nathalie said…
I'm 5'10 yet I prefer those vintage half-size patterns, as they have fuller busts with slightly narrower shoulders than full-size. I like my bodices fitted and full-size patterns (even those allegedly in my size) always seem to come up baggy or fall off the shoulders, and have to be taken in.
I find it much easier to lengthen the waist (when necessary) and add a good 4 - 5 inches to the bottom hem than to do FBAs...
At Jan 4, 2010 7:12:00 PM,
Theresa said…
The slender, cookie, comes from the style of the pattern -- it's supposed to make you look "pounds slimmer."
Post a Comment
<< Home