I just bought another shirtdress pattern. If this goes on I will soon have every button-front dress with a collar EVER MADE. This one came from Out of the Ashes; I guess that means I can stop my eBay search for it. Possibly not. I could try to corner the vintage-shirtdress-pattern market ... [insert evil laugh here]
I bought this for the yellow version, but I have a sneaking suspicion the red might get made, too. Aren't those neckline pleats lovely? Not so sure about the one in the middle; it looks a bit fussy to me ...
There's a back view, too, and I think -- I'm not sure, but it's entirely possible -- that the collar is constructed with a diagonal seam at the point. I love collars like that. Of course, I could be totally wrong -- it has happened, oh, once or twice before -- but even if I am it's a lovely, lovely dress. (Even if it is virtually indistinguishable from the last five shirtdress patterns I've bought.)
Of course, I still have to figure out where the pockets will go. I think that I will have to recut the skirt so that the front piece doesn't have a center front seam, but instead two offset front side seams, and put the pockets there. (This also has the advantage of not having to make sure that center front seam is both physically and optically in line with the bodice buttons!)
Linktastic Friday will be back next week, by the way. Possibly on Wednesday or maybe even on Monday. As all the psychologists know, intermittent reinforcement is the best way to keep people's interest up ...


































Ooh, very nice! When you make your dresses, do you usually use the recommended yardage of fabric? I end up using at least a yard less! I'm not sure why, as I only shorten the hem, but otherwise follow directions!
Posted by: Mcfilibuster | 03/28/2008 at 08:44 AM
How do you physically get into a dress like that yellow one? If the buttons only go to the waist, I don't think I'd be able to get it over my shoulders. Are those buttons just for show? Is there a side zipper? Does anybody else have any idea what I'm talking about?
Posted by: Julia | 03/28/2008 at 08:52 AM
Julia: My guess is that there is a side zipper on the yellow dress. Nancy: I usually use less, but not a whole yard less on most patterns. Seems to be more around half a yard. My theory is pattern companies call for a little extra yardage just so when someone messes up, they've got a little extra to make a new sleeve or whatever, and they won't somehow blame the pattern co. Also I find that some of their layouts are wasteful, and if I lay them out as makes sense to me, I use less fabric.
Posted by: MadeByAmanda | 03/28/2008 at 09:04 AM
The red dress! Yes! Totally 100% love it. Nancy: Me too. Sometimes I just ignore what they tell me and try to fit the pattern on whatever I have in my stash. Other times, I have enough extra to make a jacket or handbag or reserve for the hypothetical quilt stash. madebyamanda: Yes! That's it exactly. It seems the pattern companies lay out things in a very fabric-wasting kind of manner. I can always conserve a bunch by just rearranging my layout to the most intuitive fit. Especially since I sometimes have to alter things to the extent that the patterns are no longer the size or shape they were printed to be. I think, though, some of it may have to do with lining up the fabric's print. If you're working with stripes or checks, for example, you need more room to spread out the pieces. So maybe they're accounting for that and don't want people to get mad about that sort of thing.Julia: Maybe there's a secret invisible zipper in the front seam of the skirt, just below the buttons?
Posted by: tea | 03/28/2008 at 09:13 AM
Dahlings, I leave that to my seamstress.
Posted by: Mad Fashionista | 03/28/2008 at 09:16 AM
I love the yellow version, too. I think the pleats on the red one would drive me batty, though. I don't like having flounce on my chest. Back when I first started sewing vintage patterns, I attempted a blouse with a diagonal back collar like that. I couldn't figure it out to save my life. Perhaps I should dig it out and try again.--Lydia
Posted by: Anonymous | 03/28/2008 at 09:18 AM
Gosh, is it Friday already?Weird, I'm sure I was watching this very pattern on eBay a couple of weeks ago - wonder why it didn't come up in your search? (though I have missed some Claire McCardell items that way...) I love every version, but especially that neckline on the red one (I have a narrow upper chest so I've been eyeing patterns with that sort of design feature). Please post a picture if you make it, so we can see how it looks on a real human.
Posted by: Nora | 03/28/2008 at 09:35 AM
The red one is just adorable! I don't need chest pleats, but they'd be cute on some folks for sure!Monique in TX
Posted by: Anonymous | 03/28/2008 at 09:53 AM
Julia - Every shirtdress I've made (with a fitted, vintage silhouette) has a side zip in addition to the button front.Erin - I love every single view on there! I'd made one of each. And probably in those same colors. That shawl-ish collar on #2 is fantastic.
Posted by: Rebecca | 03/28/2008 at 09:56 AM
I LOVE the red version, and now, I may have to track down this pattern for myself. I bought the one you posted the other day from Miss Helene's--you are not helping my budget, Erin. And, perhaps you only think the middle one looks fussy because Miss Middle has a "fussy" pose going on.
Posted by: Doris | 03/28/2008 at 10:07 AM
Love this! I look forward to seeing which fabric you choose for it.Also, I think this pattern shows the dress being modelled by a novelty singing acts beloved by fifties TV audiences. "LadiesandGentlemen, The Singing Cappelli Sisters! Aren't they love folks? And they made the dresses themselves!"
Posted by: Jen - The Alien Spouse | 03/28/2008 at 10:15 AM
I am with the red crowd - probably because I never have had a colar turn out right yet. Of course they are all loverly.
Posted by: Theresa | 03/28/2008 at 10:24 AM
Oh, no--I like the middle version. With the right contrast fabric for the collar, it would be adorable, and it would showcase a novelty necklace very nicely.
Posted by: Latter-Day Flapper | 03/28/2008 at 10:31 AM
I think the issue with cutting out layouts is that pattern companies frequently show just one layout for several sizes and an intuitive layout that might work for one size of a pattern wouldn't necessarily work for another.
Posted by: Anonymous | 03/28/2008 at 10:40 AM
LOVE the red one - and being of the less-endowed chest variety, the more fuss up front, the better! What is it about centre front seams on dresses? I can't stand them - and I always end up doing the side seam/pocket thing too - very smart idea, I say. Nice pick! Leah xx
Posted by: Hyena In Petticoats | 03/28/2008 at 10:43 AM
I think the middle one is looking fussy because of the patterned fabric the illustration shows - I bet if you made it in a plain fabric, or a less busy patterned one, it would look just as nice as the other two!
Posted by: Anonymous | 03/28/2008 at 11:02 AM
I was looking at this pattern the other day - ( though I'll have to grade up mine ) and it has a short side zip in the bodice half, and snaps below in the skirt, all in the side seam. As for laying out, my mom taught me to rearrange the pieces so that I could "save a few inches" of fabric. I can't let go of that habit, and now 30+ years later have boxes full of 'inches'. And of course not what you'd combine into a quilt.
Posted by: Renee | 03/28/2008 at 11:39 AM
These shirtdresses are KILLING me, Erin. Now I'm on a yard-sale and flea-market treasure hunt to find old patterns for a 38 bust. [sigh]
Posted by: Miss Kitty | 03/28/2008 at 11:47 AM
Vogue Patterns just reissued a new dress that is sort of "mock shirt dress" but with my fave - pin tucks. http://www.voguepatterns.com/item/V1044.htm?tab=whats_new&page=1I thought of you. I try to buy vintage patterns when I can because $16.50 is a bit steep for a pattern but for an uncut pattern you can get in any size you want, not too bad.
Posted by: tcarole | 03/28/2008 at 12:08 PM
The red one is perfect for a patio party! (I think some old fashioned fabrics was manufactured narrower, as well, so you needed to make up for that in length.)
Posted by: Cookie | 03/28/2008 at 12:14 PM
Oooh....I love the second one. I would probably put a little cap sleeve on it to soften it up a bit. I think the neckline is really sharp.
Posted by: RachelMM | 03/28/2008 at 01:03 PM
Miss Kitty! Born too Late Vintage - she has busty patterns.
Posted by: Theresa | 03/28/2008 at 01:07 PM
The red one is perfect - I've seen two blouses with that exact neckline on television - can't remember who now - and thought I'd love to make something like it.
Posted by: Wendy | 03/28/2008 at 01:11 PM
As a shirtdress lover myself, I simply adore when you post your purchases!!! I think that every single one of these versions deserves to be made, but the yellow one is a true gem! Lovely!
Posted by: Roberta J. | 03/28/2008 at 02:42 PM
You are evil, Erin - after reading, I went to the site and snagged the B38 shirtwaist with the two different skirts.http://risingfeenix.com/inc/sdetail/18328 No pockets that I can see, but...hehe...that never stopped me before.
Posted by: Toby Wollin | 03/28/2008 at 02:47 PM